From what I can see, the situation is indeed not optimistic. We can only try to seize the opportunity to catch the scammer and attempt to recover the payment.
I have always believed that good cooperation is built on equality and sincerity between both parties. Therefore, we hope to find a solution that is acceptable to both sides. If we simply hope that the other party bears all the losses, it often backfires.
Since the loss has already occurred, we hope that both sides can understand each other and share the responsibility. After resolving the issue with the first batch of goods through negotiation, we can proceed with the subsequent orders. Our suggestion is that we bear one-third of the 70% payment lost, while you bear two-thirds. Once the payment is received, we will immediately release the bill of lading. This way, we can effectively resolve the problem promptly, and both parties' losses can be gradually compensated in future cooperation.
It seems not a not good for the current situation, we should recover the payment instead of keeping waiting here. However, I think how to solve the present problem is great important. I don’t think is fair for one of us to pay full responsibility to it. We should share the responsibility together. After discuss, our company will undertake the 1/3 lost for the 70% balance payment as a friendly cooperation. And we will tel-release the B/L immediately after receiving the 2/3 of the 70% balance. Onl
The situation seems not very optimistic so far. What we can do is only to find the cheater and try to get the money back.
As what I believed all along, good cooperation is based on mutual equality and trust between the seller and the buyer. Therefore, we hope we can reach an agreement which can be accepted by both sides.It may go the wrong way if we only want one party to undertake all of the loss. Since the loss has happened, we hope we can under